Newsroom
Truxton Corporation (TRUX) Saw 5 Sessions That Broke Its Normal Range
By KlickAnalytics Data Insights | October 2, 2026 07:52PM ET
Here is what actually moved Truxton Corporation (TRUX): the 5 sessions in the last month that broke out of its normal range, each measured against the stock's own 60-day volatility rather than a fixed percentage.
2026-10-01 — $24.7000 (+0.00%)
Truxton rose 0.00% to $24.70, though on light volume (0.2x the 20-day average). Shares opened with a 1.78% gap down and reversed through the session and closed near the session high (100% of the day's range). The move left the stock 75.6% below its 52-week high.
2026-09-23 — $24.5000 (-3.09%)
Truxton fell 3.09% to $24.50, its biggest one-day drop in 3 weeks, on 5.7x average volume. This was largely stock-specific: the S&P 500 fell 0.72% while Financial Services peers (XLF) fell 0.47% that session, leaving about 2.6 points of the move unexplained by its sector. Shares opened with a 1.11% gap down and closed near the session low (0% of the day's range).
2026-09-02 — $25.1900 (-75.09%)
Truxton fell 75.09% to $25.19, its biggest one-day drop in 3.1 years and a 1.9sigma move against its 60-day volatility, though on light volume (0.6x the 20-day average). This was largely stock-specific: the S&P 500 gained 0.44% while Financial Services peers (XLF) rose 0.80% that session, leaving about 75.3 points of the move unexplained by the market after adjusting for a 0.54 beta. Shares opened with a 74.57% gap down, closed near the session low (0% of the day's range) and lost their 20- and 50-day moving averages. The move erased $856.1M of market value.
2026-09-01 — $101.1300 (+0.00%)
Truxton rose 0.00% to $101.13. Shares set a 52-week closing high.
2026-08-27 — $25.1000 (-1.49%)
Truxton fell 1.49% to $25.10, a 1.6sigma move against its 60-day volatility, though on light volume (0.6x the 20-day average). Roughly 0.8 points were stock-specific — the S&P 500 gained 0.66% while Financial Services peers (XLF) fell 0.65% alongside it. Shares opened with a 1.41% gap down, closed near the session low (0% of the day's range) and lost their 20-day moving average.
The short version: separating what the market did from what the company did is most of the work; the attribution above does it session by session.
Base rates are a starting point for a decision, never the whole of one.
Explore more on KlickAnalytics: Overview · Technicals · Seasonality · Chart
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with