Summary
Performance
Historical returnsSnapshot
Key statisticsPrice Chart
Advanced chartCompareNotable Price Movement
Historical returnsPrice Performance
All periods| Period | Period Low | Period High | Performance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Month | 0 on 01/20/25 | 2 0.00% on 01/16/25 | +0 (+0.00%) since 01/16/25 | |
| 3-Month | 0 on 11/14/24 | 2 0.00% on 11/20/24 | +1 (+100.00%) since 11/12/24 | |
| 6-Month | 0 on 08/22/24 | 2 0.00% on 08/14/24 | +1 (+100.00%) since 08/13/24 | |
| YTD | 0 on 01/08/25 | 2 0.00% on 01/02/25 | +0 (+0.00%) since 01/02/25 | |
| 52-Week | 0 on 02/07/24 | 2 0.00% on 02/08/24 | +1 (+100.00%) since 02/06/24 |
New Highs
Historical highsAsk the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with