Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- The Bull and Bear Case for CRA International, Inc. (CRAI): 7 Points Against 1
- Citizens & Northern Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- ACNB Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- Bankwell Financial and the Split Between 8 Bulls and 1 Bears
- Chemung Financial in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Malibu Boats: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Liquidity Services: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- United States Lime & Minerals: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Abeona Therapeutics Has 8 Bulls and 5 Bears to Sort Through
- American Public Education and the Split Between 8 Bulls and 3 Bears
- Innodata After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Cadiz Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- Cathay General Bancorp Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Live Oak Bancshares: One Side Has 8 Points, the Other 2
- MediWound in the Numbers: The Bears Have More to Work With
- German American Bancorp Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Utah Medical Products With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- What the Data Says For and Against Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT)
- Cass Information Systems: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- Arbutus Biopharma: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Cogent Communications in Focus: An Evenly Argued Case
- ATN International: One Side Has 6 Points, the Other 2
- Criteo Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- NeoGenomics After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Univest Financial Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- Marten Transport Draws Both Sides as The Bears Have More to Work With
- BioLife Solutions Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Central Garden & Pet: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- First Busey in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- CNB Financial Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- CF Bankshares and the Split Between 8 Bulls and 1 Bears
- Gladstone Capital in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Amtech Systems Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Alphatec Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- First Financial Bankshares: Beat consensus EPS in 7 of the last 8 quarters as Consensus sees only -14.5% revenue growth in 2026
- Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- MGP Ingredients in the Numbers: An Evenly Argued Case
- Kulicke and Soffa Industries: Beat consensus EPS in 6 of the last 8 quarters as FY2025 earnings fell 100.3% to $213.0K
- Calumet Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Balchem Sets Up a 7-Point Bull Case Against a 1-Point Bear Case
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with