Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- What the Data Says For and Against Inogen, Inc. (INGN)
- Agilysys Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Cytokinetics: FY2025 earnings rose 33.2% to -$784.96M as Still 20.6% below its 52-week high of $87.26
- Citi Trends Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Apogee Enterprises: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- First Mid Bancshares After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- The RMR: Holds 8.0% above its 200-day average as FY2025 earnings fell 27.2% to $38.68M
- Seanergy Maritime: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Mid Penn Bancorp Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- Ultra Clean Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Open Text Corporation (OTEX): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 4 Bearish
- The Chefs' Warehouse: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Johnson Outdoors: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (FLWS): The Bears Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 0 Bullish Points to 8 Bearish
- Dorchester Minerals, L.P.: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Richardson Electronics in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Patrick Industries: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Park-Ohio: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- First Community Bankshares: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Preferred Bank: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- Peoples Bancorp After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Astec Industries: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Kearny Financial Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Ohio Valley Banc: One Side Has 3 Points, the Other 3
- Lincoln Educational Services Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Barrett Business Services: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Columbus McKinnon Sets Up a 7-Point Bull Case Against a 5-Point Bear Case
- The Bull and Bear Case for Integra LifeSciences (IART): 8 Points Against 3
- VEON: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Vericel Sets Up an 8-Point Bull Case Against a 2-Point Bear Case
- CareTrust REIT With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- What the Data Says For and Against NICE Ltd. (NICE)
- Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Enterprise Financial Services Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Oxford Lane Capital: An Evenly Argued Case After the Latest Review
- Protagonist Therapeutics Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Matthews International in the Numbers: The Bears Have More to Work With
- Scholastic: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- LendingTree Sets Up a 6-Point Bull Case Against a 6-Point Bear Case
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with