Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- United Fire: One Side Has 8 Points, the Other 0
- The Bull and Bear Case for Seabridge Gold Inc. (SA): 3 Points Against 2
- Kronos Worldwide: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Sensient Technologies: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- MACOM Technology Solutions: One Side Has 8 Points, the Other 6
- Genuine Parts: One Side Has 5 Points, the Other 4
- FTAI Aviation With An Evenly Argued Case and a Bear Case Still Standing
- Essex Property Trust: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- MasTec, Inc. (MTZ): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 3 Bearish
- Medpace Sets Up an 8-Point Bull Case Against a 3-Point Bear Case
- Zebra Technologies Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Tractor Supply: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Alliant Energy With An Evenly Argued Case and a Bear Case Still Standing
- Franklin Resources Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Fortive Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- Clean Harbors: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- APA Corporation: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Rollins Has 2 Bulls and 8 Bears to Sort Through
- Leidos: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Invitation Homes: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- RB Global: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- Annaly Capital Management: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Weyerhaeuser: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- PTC Inc. Draws Both Sides as An Evenly Argued Case
- MKS Inc.: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 6 Bullish Points to 3 Bearish
- Akamai Technologies: Beat consensus EPS in 8 of the last 8 quarters as Still 34.6% below its 52-week high of $161.14
- W. P. Carey Draws Both Sides as An Evenly Argued Case
- James Hardie Industries: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Aramark Sets Up an 8-Point Bull Case Against a 1-Point Bear Case
- Neurocrine Biosciences in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Jazz Pharmaceuticals: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- Unum and the Split Between 6 Bulls and 4 Bears
- RBC Bearings: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Tyler Technologies: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- The Carlyle Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Textron After the Filings: An Evenly Argued Case
- Mid-America Apartment Communities: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Sun Communities Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Lattice Semiconductor: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with