Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- M&T Bank: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Gold Fields Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- The Kroger in Focus: The Bears Have More to Work With
- The Estée Lauder Companies: Holds 7.0% above its 200-day average as FY2026 earnings fell 116.1% to $182.00M
- Public Service Enterprise and the Split Between 4 Bulls and 7 Bears
- The Hershey Draws Both Sides as An Evenly Argued Case
- PPL Corporation Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- Steel Dynamics Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- WEC Energy in Focus: An Evenly Argued Case
- Centene: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Iron Mountain: One Side Has 8 Points, the Other 3
- Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 4 Bearish
- EQT Corporation Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- Arch Capital After the Filings: An Evenly Argued Case
- An Evenly Argued Case for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals as the Counts Stack Up
- Crown Castle: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- DexCom With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- ResMed Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Biogen Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- Jabil: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Teck Resources Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Carnival Corporation Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Illumina: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- HP Inc. Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Zoetis: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- PG&E and the Split Between 5 Bulls and 7 Bears
- ORIX in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Martin Marietta Materials: 12 of 15 covering analysts rate the shares a buy as FY2025 earnings fell 43.0% to $1.14B
- Cboe Global Markets Sets Up a 6-Point Bull Case Against a 3-Point Bear Case
- Vodafone Group Public: Holds 19.9% above its 200-day average as FY2026 earnings fell 101.6% to $59.00M
- Halliburton: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- What the Data Says For and Against The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC)
- Ameren: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Las Vegas Sands Sets Up a 4-Point Bull Case Against a 7-Point Bear Case
- ON Semiconductor: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- ArcelorMittal Has 5 Bulls and 5 Bears to Sort Through
- LPL Financial: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Atmos Energy Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- DTE Energy in Focus: An Evenly Argued Case
- W. R. Berkley: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with