Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- LXP Industrial Trust: Holds 17.8% above its 200-day average as Consensus sees only -1.0% revenue growth in 2026
- Ellington Financial Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Sunstone Hotel Investors in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Evolent Health Sets Up an 8-Point Bull Case Against a 7-Point Bear Case
- Mach Natural Resources LP After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc. (MD): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 5 Bullish Points to 3 Bearish
- Modine Manufacturing: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- The Bulls Have More to Work With for Employers as the Counts Stack Up
- The Bull and Bear Case for UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH): 7 Points Against 2
- Rayonier Advanced Materials: FY2025 earnings rose 901.8% to -$420.00M as Still 27.4% below its 52-week high of $11.75
- The Gorman-Rupp Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- What the Data Says For and Against Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP)
- The Bears Have More to Work With for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust as the Counts Stack Up
- Insperity: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- Orion: The Bears Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- ONE Gas: One Side Has 6 Points, the Other 1
- Oceaneering International With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- OR Royalties and the Split Between 6 Bulls and 2 Bears
- Plains GP Holdings LP: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Eastman Kodak in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- LTC Properties: One Side Has 7 Points, the Other 3
- MaxLinear: One Side Has 8 Points, the Other 5
- ProPetro: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- OFG Bancorp in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Telus Sets Up a 1-Point Bull Case Against an 8-Point Bear Case
- Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Tanger Inc. (SKT): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 2 Bearish
- The Marcus Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- KB Home in Focus: The Bears Have More to Work With
- Murphy Oil: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Nu Skin Enterprises: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- What the Data Says For and Against Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP)
- Precision Drilling Draws Both Sides as An Evenly Argued Case
- Sabine Royalty Trust in the Numbers: An Evenly Argued Case
- New Mountain Finance: One Side Has 4 Points, the Other 7
- LMP Capital and Income Fund: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- What the Data Says For and Against Stellus Capital Investment (SCM)
- Forum Energy Technologies Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with