Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- Richardson Electronics: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- An Evenly Argued Case for MGP Ingredients as the Counts Stack Up
- Kulicke and Soffa Industries in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Calumet After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Balchem With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- Inogen: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Agilysys: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- Cytokinetics Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Apogee Enterprises: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- First Mid Bancshares: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- An Evenly Argued Case for The RMR as the Counts Stack Up
- Seanergy Maritime: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 6 Bullish Points to 1 Bearish
- Mid Penn Bancorp: One Side Has 8 Points, the Other 1
- Ultra Clean Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- What the Data Says For and Against Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP)
- The Chefs' Warehouse Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Johnson Outdoors Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Dorchester Minerals, L.P.: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Park-Ohio and the Split Between 8 Bulls and 3 Bears
- First Community Bankshares in the Numbers: An Evenly Argued Case
- Preferred Bank: One Side Has 6 Points, the Other 2
- Peoples Bancorp Sets Up a 7-Point Bull Case Against a 1-Point Bear Case
- Astec Industries: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Kearny Financial: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- Ohio Valley Banc: Holds 7.6% above its 200-day average as Gross margin slipped to 55.6% from 68.0% a year ago
- The Bull and Bear Case for Lincoln Educational Services (LINC): 8 Points Against 4
- Matthews International: The Bears Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- Barrett Business Services: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Columbus McKinnon: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- Integra LifeSciences After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- NICE: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- VEON After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- The Bull and Bear Case for CareTrust REIT, Inc. (CTRE): 6 Points Against 2
- Vericel Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ARWR): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 3 Bearish
- Enterprise Financial Services Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Oxford Lane Capital: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 3 Bearish
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with