Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- iRhythm Technologies Has 8 Bulls and 4 Bears to Sort Through
- Horizon Technology Finance: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 7 Bullish Points to 5 Bearish
- Inspired Entertainment After the Filings: The Bears Have More to Work With
- Omeros: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- Silicon Motion Technology Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- The Andersons Has 7 Bulls and 3 Bears to Sort Through
- Euroseas Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Transcat: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Radware: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- United Bankshares: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- The Bull and Bear Case for Optical Cable Corporation (OCC): 6 Points Against 3
- El Pollo Loco Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- Farmers National Banc After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Hanmi Financial in the Numbers: An Evenly Argued Case
- SLR Investment: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- UFP Industries Draws Both Sides as The Bears Have More to Work With
- LSI Industries Draws a Split Lean From the Lists
- Gibraltar Industries With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- Farmers & Merchants Bancorp: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- RCI Hospitality Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- The Bull and Bear Case for Neogen Corporation (NEOG): 8 Points Against 4
- LeMaitre Vascular: An Evenly Argued Case After the Latest Review
- Alarm.com in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Investors Title Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Lakeland Financial Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- PRA Group in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Theravance Biopharma in the Numbers: The Bears Have More to Work With
- FRP Holdings Sets Up a 1-Point Bull Case Against a 3-Point Bear Case
- Southern Missouri Bancorp in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- UMB Financial: Beat consensus EPS in 7 of the last 8 quarters as Consensus sees only -32.7% revenue growth in 2026
- Aviat Networks After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Gentherm: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- The Bull and Bear Case for Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. (SBRA): 8 Points Against 4
- United Natural Foods Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bearish
- What the Data Says For and Against Uniti Group Inc. (UNIT)
- 8x8, Inc. in Focus: An Evenly Argued Case
- An Evenly Argued Case for Codexis as the Counts Stack Up
- Ascendis Pharma A/S After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Achieve Life Sciences: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with