Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- Tourism Enterprises: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- The Bears Have More to Work With for Northern Region Cement as the Counts Stack Up
- Salama Cooperative Insurance Company (8050): An Evenly Argued Case on the Numbers, 3 Bullish Points to 4 Bearish
- Nayifat Finance: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Al-Dawaa Medical Services Draws Both Sides as The Bears Have More to Work With
- United Cooperative Assurance: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Saudi Industrial Development After the Filings: An Evenly Argued Case
- Gas Arabian Services Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- Amlak International for Real Estate Finance Looks Bearish by Count, Not by Certainty
- Modern Mills for Food Products in the Numbers: An Evenly Argued Case
- Al Obeikan Glass: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Riyadh Cement: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Bin Dawood Holding Sets Up a 2-Point Bull Case Against a 5-Point Bear Case
- Gulf Insurance Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Split
- Taiba Investments Draws a Split Lean From the Lists
- What the Data Says For and Against Arabia Insurance Cooperative Company (8160)
- Takween Advanced Industries in Focus: The Bears Have More to Work With
- Almoosa Health: An Evenly Argued Case After the Latest Review
- Saudi Arabian Cooperative Insurance Has 3 Bulls and 3 Bears to Sort Through
- Gulf General Cooperative Insurance Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- United Wire Factories: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Filing & Packing Materials Manufacturing Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Herfy Food Services: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Zahrat Al Waha For Trading: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Al Rajhi Banking and Investment: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Saudi Arabian Oil With An Evenly Argued Case and a Bear Case Still Standing
- Rabigh Refining and Petrochemical Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- Alinma Bank Has 4 Bulls and 2 Bears to Sort Through
- The Saudi National Bank: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- What the Data Says For and Against Saudi Arabian Mining Company (Ma'aden) (1211)
- Saudi Tadawul Group Holding: One Side Has 2 Points, the Other 7
- Bank AlJazira in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Saudi Basic Industries: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- The Bull and Bear Case for Saudi Awwal Bank (1060): 2 Points Against 2
- SABIC Agri-Nutrients Company (2020): The Bears Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 1 Bullish Points to 5 Bearish
- Elm: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- ACWA POWER Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- Americana Restaurants International Has 8 Bulls and 1 Bears to Sort Through
- SAL Saudi Logistics Services Co: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Mouwasat Medical Services: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with