Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- Camden Property Trust: One Side Has 4 Points, the Other 7
- The AES Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Molina Healthcare Sets Up a 6-Point Bull Case Against a 7-Point Bear Case
- The Bull and Bear Case for Align Technology, Inc. (ALGN): 5 Points Against 5
- Paycom Software: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- What the Data Says For and Against Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS)
- DICK'S Sporting Goods: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- Lululemon Athletica: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Huntington Ingalls Industries in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Bio-Techne Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Sirius XM: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Deckers Outdoor After the Filings: The Bears Have More to Work With
- Corcept Therapeutics Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- The Clorox: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- First Horizon: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Range Resources Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- An Evenly Argued Case for AGNC Investment as the Counts Stack Up
- Pinnacle West Capital Sets Up a 4-Point Bull Case Against a 2-Point Bear Case
- Corning: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- UDR, Inc.: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Gaming and Leisure Properties Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Federal Realty Investment Trust: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- American Financial: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- The New York Times After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Equity LifeStyle Properties Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Pacific Biosciences of California Sets Up a 3-Point Bull Case Against a 6-Point Bear Case
- Texas Roadhouse Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Split
- Oshkosh: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- Antero Resources Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Crown: One Side Has 8 Points, the Other 1
- Baxter International: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Ryanair Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bearish
- What the Data Says For and Against Repligen Corporation (RGEN)
- U-Haul: One Side Has 4 Points, the Other 6
- BioMarin Pharmaceutical: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- Alcoa: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- DaVita Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY): An Evenly Argued Case on the Numbers, 5 Bullish Points to 4 Bearish
- Valmont Industries Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Ocean Power Technologies Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with