Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- Frequency Electronics: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- CVB Financial Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Ellington Financial Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Blackbaud With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- Papa John's International: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Limoneira: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Willis Lease Finance in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Dorchester Minerals, L.P.: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- LMP Capital and Income Fund: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- The Bulls Have More to Work With for Gladstone Investment as the Counts Stack Up
- KB Home in Focus: The Bears Have More to Work With
- Portland General Electric Sets Up a 4-Point Bull Case Against a 5-Point Bear Case
- New Mountain Finance: One Side Has 4 Points, the Other 7
- Sunstone Hotel Investors in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- LTC Properties: One Side Has 7 Points, the Other 3
- Modine Manufacturing: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- An Evenly Argued Case for The RMR as the Counts Stack Up
- The Gorman-Rupp Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- The Bears Have More to Work With for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust as the Counts Stack Up
- Open Text Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 2 Bearish
- Broadwind With An Evenly Argued Case and a Bear Case Still Standing
- The Chefs' Warehouse Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- IRadimed: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- OFG Bancorp in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Rayonier Advanced Materials: FY2025 earnings rose 901.8% to -$420.00M as Still 27.4% below its 52-week high of $11.75
- Ovid Therapeutics: Holds 20.5% above its 200-day average as FY2025 earnings fell 34.1% to -$17.41M
- RLJ Lodging Trust and the Split Between 5 Bulls and 6 Bears
- The Greenbrier Companies Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Matrix Service and the Split Between 4 Bulls and 8 Bears
- The Hackett Draws Both Sides as An Evenly Argued Case
- AudioCodes: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Apogee Enterprises: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- JetBlue Airways: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Richardson Electronics: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Varonis Systems in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Oil-Dri Corporation of America Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- DXP Enterprises: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- Cytokinetics Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Safe Bulkers Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with