Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Summit Hotel Properties in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- First Community Bankshares in the Numbers: An Evenly Argued Case
- Plains GP Holdings LP: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- The Bulls Have More to Work With for Griffon as the Counts Stack Up
- Harmonic After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- The Marcus Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- Oceaneering International With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Oil-Dri Corporation of America Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Eastman Kodak in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- ProPetro: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Sabine Royalty Trust in the Numbers: An Evenly Argued Case
- Dorchester Minerals, L.P.: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Orion: The Bears Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- ONE Gas: One Side Has 6 Points, the Other 1
- New Mountain Finance: One Side Has 4 Points, the Other 7
- Ohio Valley Banc: Holds 7.6% above its 200-day average as Gross margin slipped to 55.6% from 68.0% a year ago
- Myriad Genetics: One Side Has 3 Points, the Other 8
- TrustCo Bank Corp NY Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Lifetime Brands: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- The Chefs' Warehouse Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- The9 and the Split Between 3 Bulls and 6 Bears
- First Business Financial Services Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- ICF International: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- RadNet: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- C&F Financial: FY2025 earnings rose 35.5% to $26.99M as Gross margin slipped to 70.3% from 72.2% a year ago
- The Bulls Have More to Work With for Alkermes as the Counts Stack Up
- Washington Trust Bancorp: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Kulicke and Soffa Industries in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Frequency Electronics: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Glacier Bancorp: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- The Bulls Have More to Work With for Employers as the Counts Stack Up
- Madrigal Pharmaceuticals Sets Up an 8-Point Bull Case Against a 3-Point Bear Case
- Kforce in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- The Bull and Bear Case for WD-40 Company (WDFC): 6 Points Against 3
- Corvus Pharmaceuticals in Focus: The Bears Have More to Work With
- Kornit Digital in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Evolent Health Sets Up an 8-Point Bull Case Against a 7-Point Bear Case
- Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with