Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- SPS Commerce Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- CEVA in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- AxoGen Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- Radware: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- National CineMedia: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- The Bulls Have More to Work With for Nova as the Counts Stack Up
- AMC Global Media Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- BJ's Restaurants and the Split Between 7 Bulls and 3 Bears
- FTI Consulting: One Side Has 0 Points, the Other 4
- UFP Technologies: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Daktronics: An Evenly Argued Case After the Latest Review
- Omnicell: Beat consensus EPS in 7 of the last 8 quarters as FY2025 earnings fell 83.6% to $2.05M
- AngioDynamics and the Split Between 8 Bulls and 2 Bears
- What the Data Says For and Against Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN)
- MediWound: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- Energy Recovery Looks Bearish by Count, Not by Certainty
- The Bulls Have More to Work With for Merit Medical Systems as the Counts Stack Up
- Anavex Life Sciences Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- Synaptics: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- CAMP4 Therapeutics: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- The Bull and Bear Case for RADCOM Ltd. (RDCM): 3 Points Against 8
- Everspin Technologies: Has recovered 136.5% off the 52-week low of $6.79 as FY2025 earnings fell 175.0% to -$586.0K
- First Internet Bancorp (INBK): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 5 Bearish
- ACI Worldwide Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Seneca Foods Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- National Energy Services Reunited: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Independent Bank: One Side Has 7 Points, the Other 1
- Star Bulk Carriers Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- OraSure Technologies Draws a Split Lean From the Lists
- Limbach Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- The Bulls Have More to Work With for HealthEquity as the Counts Stack Up
- Stock Yards Bancorp: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- MiMedx: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- What the Data Says For and Against Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. (CAPR)
- Aemetis: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- The Bears Have More to Work With for GoPro as the Counts Stack Up
- Green Plains Inc. (GPRE): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 6 Bearish
- JAKKS Pacific: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Cadiz Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Power Integrations: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with