Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- Devon Energy Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- AutoZone: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Imperial Oil: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Entergy in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Vale: One Side Has 4 Points, the Other 5
- Chipotle Mexican Grill Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- The Bulls Have More to Work With for Veeva Systems as the Counts Stack Up
- Paychex Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- Agilent Technologies: One Side Has 8 Points, the Other 1
- CBRE Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- MSCI: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Take-Two Interactive Software Looks Split by Count, Not by Certainty
- Yum! Brands With An Evenly Argued Case and a Bear Case Still Standing
- Sysco: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- The Hartford Insurance and the Split Between 5 Bulls and 3 Bears
- The Bull and Bear Case for Ambev S.A. (ABEV): 5 Points Against 1
- Raymond James Financial: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Banco Bradesco Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Expedia Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Chunghwa Telecom Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- Kimberly-Clark With An Evenly Argued Case and a Bear Case Still Standing
- Vulcan Materials Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Cenovus Energy: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Copart Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Kinross Gold: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- Cognizant Technology Solutions: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Citizens Financial: FY2025 earnings rose 21.3% to $1.83B as Consensus sees only -17.6% revenue growth in 2026
- Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR): An Evenly Argued Case on the Numbers, 3 Bullish Points to 2 Bearish
- Celestica in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Teledyne Technologies: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Ingersoll Rand: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- Wipro in Focus: The Bears Have More to Work With
- What the Data Says For and Against Restaurant Brands International (QSR)
- West Pharmaceutical Services Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- The Bull and Bear Case for J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT): 8 Points Against 2
- Dover: One Side Has 5 Points, the Other 3
- CenterPoint Energy: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- ATI Inc. With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- What the Data Says For and Against Synchrony Financial (SYF)
- Verisk Analytics Has 4 Bulls and 3 Bears to Sort Through
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with