Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- Gartner: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- The Bull and Bear Case for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY): 5 Points Against 4
- Deckers Outdoor Draws a Bearish Lean From the Lists
- Evercore: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Lululemon Athletica in Focus: The Bears Have More to Work With
- Camden Property Trust Looks Bearish by Count, Not by Certainty
- Huntington Ingalls Industries Has 7 Bulls and 3 Bears to Sort Through
- The Clorox: One Side Has 3 Points, the Other 7
- Domino's Pizza Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Bio-Techne: Holds 18.8% above its 200-day average as Consensus sees only -0.7% revenue growth in 2026
- Generac Holdings in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Skyworks Solutions Sets Up a 4-Point Bull Case Against a 5-Point Bear Case
- Align Technology: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Allison Transmission Holdings After the Filings: An Evenly Argued Case
- The New York Times Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Littelfuse Sets Up an 8-Point Bull Case Against a 3-Point Bear Case
- Popular: Holds 15.5% above its 200-day average as Consensus sees only -18.9% revenue growth in 2026
- The Bull and Bear Case for EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP): 8 Points Against 0
- FactSet Research Systems Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bearish
- Owens Corning: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Donaldson Company With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- Darling Ingredients: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- BXP: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- The Bull and Bear Case for The AES Corporation (AES): 8 Points Against 3
- SouthState Bank Corp. (SSB): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 3 Bearish
- Wintrust Financial: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- Cullen/Frost Bankers: One Side Has 8 Points, the Other 4
- Bio-Rad Laboratories Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- Universal Health Services: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Henry Schein: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- Federal Realty Investment Trust Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Molina Healthcare: One Side Has 6 Points, the Other 6
- Paycom Software Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- Flowserve: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Voya Financial, Inc. (VOYA): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 7 Bullish Points to 3 Bearish
- Oshkosh in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Range Resources: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Old Republic International in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- OGE Energy Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Aptiv (APTV): An Evenly Argued Case on the Numbers, 7 Bullish Points to 7 Bearish
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with