Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- Teck Resources Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- Centene: Beat consensus EPS in 7 of the last 8 quarters as FY2025 earnings fell 302.7% to -$6.68B
- The Bulls Have More to Work With for Jabil as the Counts Stack Up
- EQT Corporation Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- HP Inc. Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- Martin Marietta Materials Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Mettler-Toledo International: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- The Kraft Heinz With An Evenly Argued Case and a Bear Case Still Standing
- The Bull and Bear Case for Ameren Corporation (AEE): 6 Points Against 3
- ArcelorMittal Has 6 Bulls and 5 Bears to Sort Through
- Quest Diagnostics Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- W. R. Berkley Has 7 Bulls and 4 Bears to Sort Through
- Atmos Energy Has 6 Bulls and 4 Bears to Sort Through
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson Draws a Bearish Lean From the Lists
- Norwood Financial Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Independent Bank in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Broadwind Draws Both Sides as An Evenly Argued Case
- eGain Draws a Bearish Lean From the Lists
- Clearfield in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Home Bancorp: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- What the Data Says For and Against Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)
- Kingstone Companies: One Side Has 8 Points, the Other 0
- CONMED After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Papa John's International Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 1 Bearish
- What the Data Says For and Against Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL)
- PrimeEnergy Resources: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Weyco: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- The Bears Have More to Work With for Amarin as the Counts Stack Up
- Tesla: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Hudson Technologies: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- Collegium Pharmaceutical Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Bloomin' Brands With An Evenly Argued Case and a Bear Case Still Standing
- Agenus and the Split Between 7 Bulls and 2 Bears
- NWPX Infrastructure: One Side Has 8 Points, the Other 2
- Air T: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- First United Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- Pyxis Tankers Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- OptimumBank: Holds 53.9% above its 200-day average as Consensus sees only -3.6% revenue growth in 2026
- The9 Draws a Bearish Lean From the Lists
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with