Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- The Andersons Has 7 Bulls and 3 Bears to Sort Through
- Capital Southwest Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Investors Title Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Farmers National Banc After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- The Bull and Bear Case for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG): 7 Points Against 3
- The Bull and Bear Case for Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL): 8 Points Against 4
- Gencor Industries: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Gevo: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Ramaco Resources Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- Five9: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Digi International: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- UMB Financial: Beat consensus EPS in 7 of the last 8 quarters as Consensus sees only -32.7% revenue growth in 2026
- CRISPR Therapeutics Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- Marten Transport Has 2 Bulls and 8 Bears to Sort Through
- Hope Bancorp Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- SSR Mining Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- Commvault Systems: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- ATN International: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- Ribbon Communications: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- National Energy Services Reunited: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Innodata Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- NBT Bancorp: Holds 12.9% above its 200-day average as Consensus sees only -12.5% revenue growth in 2026
- Dave & Buster's Entertainment Sets Up a 1-Point Bull Case Against an 8-Point Bear Case
- Progress Software Corporation (PRGS): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 2 Bearish
- Hub Group Draws a Bearish Lean From the Lists
- FirstService and the Split Between 3 Bulls and 6 Bears
- LeMaitre Vascular: An Evenly Argued Case After the Latest Review
- What the Data Says For and Against Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN)
- Omnicell: Beat consensus EPS in 7 of the last 8 quarters as FY2025 earnings fell 83.6% to $2.05M
- Silicon Laboratories: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- 1st Source in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- What the Data Says For and Against Pro-Dex, Inc. (PDEX)
- The Bull and Bear Case for Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. (SBRA): 8 Points Against 4
- An Evenly Argued Case for Melco Resorts & Entertainment as the Counts Stack Up
- Tenax Therapeutics Draws Both Sides as An Evenly Argued Case
- Xencor Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- The Bulls Have More to Work With for HealthEquity as the Counts Stack Up
- Pathward Financial: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with