Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. (FMX): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 7 Bullish Points to 2 Bearish
- Deere Has 8 Bulls and 4 Bears to Sort Through
- Edison International (EIX): An Evenly Argued Case on the Numbers, 7 Bullish Points to 7 Bearish
- HSBC Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- McDonald's: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- British American Tobacco p.l.c. Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Split
- The Bull and Bear Case for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW): 8 Points Against 5
- Gilead Sciences: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- SAP SE Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Exelon Sets Up a 4-Point Bull Case Against a 2-Point Bear Case
- Valero Energy: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Vistra: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Becton, Dickinson After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Diageo Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Split
- Petróleo Brasileiro Sets Up an 8-Point Bull Case Against a 2-Point Bear Case
- Itaú Unibanco Holding Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Texas Pacific Land Draws a Split Lean From the Lists
- Aon: One Side Has 5 Points, the Other 1
- Cadence Design Systems in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Entegris: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- Dell Technologies Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Halliburton After the Filings: An Evenly Argued Case
- Expedia Group: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Franco-Nevada Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Copart Looks Split by Count, Not by Certainty
- What the Data Says For and Against CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE)
- Dow: Beat consensus EPS in 6 of the last 8 quarters as FY2025 earnings fell 318.4% to -$2.62B
- Packaging Corporation of America: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 3 Bearish
- What the Data Says For and Against Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE)
- Amgen: One Side Has 8 Points, the Other 3
- Ventas and the Split Between 8 Bulls and 3 Bears
- Ulta Beauty Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- Ralph Lauren and the Split Between 8 Bulls and 2 Bears
- NVIDIA: One Side Has 8 Points, the Other 1
- T. Rowe Price Group Has 7 Bulls and 1 Bears to Sort Through
- Sun Life Financial Sets Up a 6-Point Bull Case Against a 2-Point Bear Case
- Hubbell Incorporated Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Apple Quietly Makes Bold Moves in Tech Industry
- Defensive Stock Analysis: Coca-Cola, Johnson & Johnson, or Procter & Gamble
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with