Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- Exxon Mobil in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Costco Wholesale: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Johnson & Johnson (JNJ): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 1 Bearish
- Intel in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Bank of America and the Split Between 8 Bulls and 2 Bears
- Cisco Systems With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- Oracle Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- Alibaba Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- The Bulls Have More to Work With for Merck as the Counts Stack Up
- UnitedHealth in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Netflix With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- SAP SE Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- The Goldman Sachs Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- Wells Fargo: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- Novo Nordisk A/S: An Evenly Argued Case After the Latest Review
- HSBC Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Texas Instruments Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- International Business Machines: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Citigroup in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- KLA Corporation: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- Verizon Communications: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Royal Bank of Canada Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- The Bull and Bear Case for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS): 5 Points Against 2
- Norfolk Southern Has 8 Bulls and 2 Bears to Sort Through
- QUALCOMM: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- The Walt Disney Has 8 Bulls and 1 Bears to Sort Through
- The Charles Schwab: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Deere: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- McDonald's: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 1 Bearish
- Gilead Sciences With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- Abbott Laboratories in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Analog Devices and the Split Between 8 Bulls and 2 Bears
- NextEra Energy With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- Welltower Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- The Boeing: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Interactive Brokers: A Mixed Record, With Bulls Holding More Cards
- Southern Copper: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- Banco Santander Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- Western Digital Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with