Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- What the Data Says For and Against Intel Corp. (INTC)
- Oracle Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- Bank of America: Holds 15.5% above its 200-day average as Consensus sees only -35.2% revenue growth in 2026
- Cisco Systems: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Alibaba Group Holding Limited: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Chevron: One Side Has 8 Points, the Other 3
- Costco Wholesale Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Lam Research Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Merck & Co.: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Applied Materials: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- UnitedHealth Group Incorporated Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- The Procter & Gamble Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bearish
- Netflix: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- The Home Depot Sets Up a 2-Point Bull Case Against a 3-Point Bear Case
- The Goldman Sachs Group: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Wells Fargo: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Toyota Motor Looks Bullish by Count, Not by Certainty
- The Bull and Bear Case for Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO): 5 Points Against 5
- KLA With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- The Bull and Bear Case for Novartis AG (NVS): 6 Points Against 5
- Texas Instruments Incorporated Has 8 Bulls and 3 Bears to Sort Through
- Citigroup Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- AstraZeneca: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Thermo Fisher Scientific: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- American Express Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- International Business Machines in Focus: The Bears Have More to Work With
- Verizon Communications: Stronger Bull Case, but the Bear Case Stays
- T-Mobile US Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- Abbott Laboratories: One Side Has 8 Points, the Other 4
- The Charles Schwab Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- PepsiCo Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- The Walt Disney Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Leaves Both Camps With Plenty to Point to
- QUALCOMM Incorporated: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Analog Devices: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- HDFC Bank Limited Sets Up a 4-Point Bull Case Against a 4-Point Bear Case
- NextEra Energy in Focus: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- Union Pacific: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- Welltower Sets Up an 8-Point Bull Case Against a 2-Point Bear Case
- The Boeing: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with