Newsroom
Market News
Both sides of the trade, grades and news round-ups. Click a headline to read it — the arrows walk the list.
Research
- Mizuho Financial Has 8 Bulls and 1 Bears to Sort Through
- Apple: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Interactive Brokers: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- Southern Copper in the Numbers: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- What the Data Says For and Against Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)
- The Boeing Has a Clearer Bull Side, but a Bear Side Too
- The Bull and Bear Case for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD): 8 Points Against 3
- SAP SE: Why the Case Still Cuts Both Ways
- Adobe Draws Both Sides as An Evenly Argued Case
- Newmont: FY2025 earnings rose 112.0% to $7.17B as Gross margin slipped to 39.7% from 47.6% a year ago
- Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 3 Bearish
- Willdan Draws Both Sides as The Bulls Have More to Work With
- KLA Corporation (KLAC): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 7 Bullish Points to 5 Bearish
- Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 5 Bullish Points to 3 Bearish
- The Bull and Bear Case for Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX): 8 Points Against 5
- What the Data Says For and Against Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY)
- Prologis Draws a Bullish Lean From the Lists
- Capital One Financial Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- The Bull and Bear Case for Altria Group, Inc. (MO): 7 Points Against 4
- ICICI Bank Sets Up a 3-Point Bull Case Against a 3-Point Bear Case
- Automatic Data Processing With The Bulls Have More to Work With and a Bear Case Still Standing
- Lowe's Companies Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Split
- Voyager Therapeutics Draws Both Sides as The Bears Have More to Work With
- Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 1 Bearish
- HSBC Holdings (HSBC): The Bulls Have More to Work With on the Numbers, 8 Bullish Points to 2 Bearish
- U.S. Bancorp: How the Bull and Bear Lists Compare
- Amgen Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Bullish
- What the Data Says For and Against Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN)
- West Bancorporation and the Split Between 8 Bulls and 1 Bears
- SmartFinancial: What the Bull-Bear Split Adds Up to
- The Bulls Have More to Work With for Eli Lilly as the Counts Stack Up
- Comcast After the Filings: The Bears Have More to Work With
- BP p.l.c.: The Bulls Have More to Work With After the Latest Review
- RELX Looks Bearish by Count, Not by Certainty
- Intuit After the Filings: The Bulls Have More to Work With
- United Parcel Service Draws Both Sides as An Evenly Argued Case
- Cadence Design Systems: More Bulls Than Bears in the Dossier
- Cintas Trading History Meets a Split Fundamental Case
- Verizon Communications in Focus: An Evenly Argued Case
- T-Mobile US Sees the Argument Tilt Toward Split
Ask the market a question. Get a calculated answer.
The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto a document store. It calls the same analytics engine that powers every screen on this platform — so what comes back is a number it computed from raw history, with the command that produced it.
86,000+ instruments
Global equities, ETFs, funds, options, FX, commodities, crypto, economics, filings, transcripts and news — one normalised symbol universe with adjusted history.
A real analytics engine
Screening, backtesting, technicals, options analytics, correlations, seasonality and factor models — computed on demand from raw prices, never a stale cache.
It shows its working
Answers arrive with the charts, tables and tool calls behind them, so you can check the number instead of trusting a paraphrase.
Your own documents
Upload filings, decks and research. Ask across them and the answer cites the page it came from.
Agents and workflows
Multi-step research that runs the platform's tools for you — screen, pull the history, compute, compare, then write it up.
MCP, CLI and API
The same command catalogue from Claude, your own agent, a shell or your pipeline. The answer on screen is the answer your job gets at 4am.
You ask
“How does NVDA usually trade through earnings?”
It calls
→ ka.options_expected_move(NVDA)
It answers
NVDA has averaged a 9.2% absolute move on the day after earnings and closed higher 67% of the time. Two in three reactions land between −4.2% and +16.3% — the distribution is skewed right, not symmetric.
Every figure computed live from our own history — not scraped, not summarised.
Or start with